4.6 Article

Planck pre-launch status: Design and description of the Low Frequency Instrument

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 520, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912853

Keywords

cosmic microwave background; cosmology: observations; space vehicles: instruments

Funding

  1. Italian Space Agency (ASI)
  2. Academy of Finland [205800, 214598, 121703, 121962]
  3. Waldemar von Frenckells Stiftelse
  4. Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation
  5. Vaisala Foundation
  6. NASA LTSA [NNG04CG90G]
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [121962, 205800, 121703, 121703, 205800, 121962] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  8. UK Space Agency [ST/H001212/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we present the Low Frequency Instrument (LFI), designed and developed as part of the Planck space mission, the ESA programme dedicated to precision imaging of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Planck-LFI will observe the full sky in intensity and polarisation in three frequency bands centred at 30, 44 and 70 GHz, while higher frequencies (100-850 GHz) will be covered by the HFI instrument. The LFI is an array of microwave radiometers based on state-of-the-art indium phosphide cryogenic HEMT amplifiers implemented in a differential system using blackbody loads as reference signals. The front end is cooled to 20 K for optimal sensitivity and the reference loads are cooled to 4 K to minimise low-frequency noise. We provide an overview of the LFI, discuss the leading scientific requirements, and describe the design solutions adopted for the various hardware subsystems. The main drivers of the radiometric, optical, and thermal design are discussed, including the stringent requirements on sensitivity, stability, and rejection of systematic effects. Further details on the key instrument units and the results of ground calibration are provided in a set of companion papers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available