4.6 Article

The thermodynamics of molecular cloud fragmentation Star formation under non-Milky Way conditions

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 510, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912236

Keywords

stars: formation; hydrodynamics; dust, extinction; equation of state; turbulence; ISM: clouds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Properties of candidate stars, forming out of molecular clouds, depend on the ambient conditions of the parent cloud. We present a series of 2D and 3D simulations of fragmentation of molecular clouds in starburst regions, as well as of clouds under conditions in dwarf galaxies, leading to the formation of protostellar cores. Aims. We explore in particular the metallicity dependence of molecular cloud fragmentation and the possible variations in the dense core mass function, as the expression of a multi-phase ISM, due to dynamic and thermodynamic effects in starburst and metal-poor environments. Methods. The adaptive mesh refinement code FLASH is used to study the level of fragmentation during the collapse. With this code, including self-gravity, thermal balance, turbulence, and shocks, collapse is simulated with four different metallicity-dependent cooling functions. Turbulent and rotational energies are considered as well. During the simulations, number densities of 10(8) - 10(9) cm(-3) are reached. The influences of dust and cosmic ray heating are investigated and compared to isothermal cases. Results. The results indicate that fragmentation increases with metallicity, while cosmic ray and gas-grain collisional heating counteract this. We also find that modest rotation and turbulence can affect the cloud evolution as far as fragmentation is concerned. In this light, we conclude that radiative feedback in starburst regions will inhibit fragmentation, while low-metallicity dwarfs should also enjoy a star formation mode in which fragmentation is suppressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available