4.6 Article

Herschel-ATLAS: Extragalactic number counts from 250 to 500 microns

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 518, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014581

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: statistics; infrared: galaxies; submillimeter: galaxies

Funding

  1. STFC [PP/D000963/1, ST/H001530/1, ST/G002622/1, ST/G001871/1, ST/G002533/1, ST/G002630/1, ST/F00298X/1, ST/H004254/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G001871/1, PP/E001181/1, ST/G002533/1, ST/G002630/1, ST/H004254/1, ST/F00298X/1, ST/G002622/1, PP/D000963/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. UK Space Agency [ST/G003874/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. The Herschel-ATLAS survey (H-ATLAS) will be the largest area survey to be undertaken by the Herschel Space Observatory. It will cover 550 sq. deg. of extragalactic sky at wavelengths of 100, 160, 250, 350 and 500 mu m when completed, reaching flux limits (5 sigma) from 32 to 145 mJy. We here present galaxy number counts obtained for SPIRE observations of the first similar to 14 sq. deg. observed at 250, 350 and 500 mu m. Methods. Number counts are a fundamental tool in constraining models of galaxy evolution. We use source catalogs extracted from the H-ATLAS maps as the basis for such an analysis. Correction factors for completeness and flux boosting are derived by applying our extraction method to model catalogs and then applied to the raw observational counts. Results. We find a steep rise in the number counts at flux levels of 100-200 mJy in all three SPIRE bands, consistent with results from BLAST. The counts are compared to a range of galaxy evolution models. None of the current models is an ideal fit to the data but all ascribe the steep rise to a population of luminous, rapidly evolving dusty galaxies at moderate to high redshift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available