4.6 Article

The far-infrared/submillimeter properties of galaxies located behind the Bullet cluster

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 518, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014693

Keywords

infrared: galaxies; submillimeter: galaxies; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: clusters: general; gravitational lensing: strong

Funding

  1. NASA
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20001003] Funding Source: KAKEN
  3. STFC [ST/F002963/1, PP/E001203/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001181/1, ST/F002963/1, PP/E001203/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Herschel Lensing Survey (HLS) takes advantage of gravitational lensing by massive galaxy clusters to sample a population of high-redshift galaxies which are too faint to be detected above the confusion limit of current far-infrared/submillimeter telescopes. Measurements from 100-500 mu m bracket the peaks of the far-infrared spectral energy distributions of these galaxies, characterizing their infrared luminosities and star formation rates. We introduce initial results from our science demonstration phase observations, directed toward the Bullet cluster (1E0657-56). By combining our observations with LABOCA 870 mu m and AzTEC 1.1 mm data we fully constrain the spectral energy distributions of 19 MIPS 24 mu m-selected galaxies which are located behind the cluster. We find that their colors are best fit using templates based on local galaxies with systematically lower infrared luminosities. This suggests that our sources are not like local ultra-luminous infrared galaxies in which vigorous star formation is contained in a compact highly dust-obscured region. Instead, they appear to be scaled up versions of lower luminosity local galaxies with star formation occurring on larger physical scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available