4.6 Article

The low-mass diskless population of Corona Australis

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 515, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913718

Keywords

stars: low-mass; stars: formation; stars: pre-main sequence; stars: luminosity function, mass function

Funding

  1. Spanish MICINN [Consolider-CSD2006-00070, ESP2007-65475-C02-02, AyA2008-02156]
  2. Madrid regional government [CAM/PRICIT-S2009ESP-1496]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  4. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We combine published optical and near-infrared photometry to identify new low-mass candidate members in an area of about 0.64 deg(2) in Corona Australis with the S-parameter method. Five new candidate members of the region are selected. They have estimated ages between 3 and 15 Myr and masses between 0.05 and 0.15 M-circle dot. With Spitzer photometry we confirm that these objects are not surrounded by optically thick disks. However, one of them is found to display excess at 24 mu m, thus suggesting it harbors a disk with an inner hole. With an estimated mass of 0.07 M-circle dot according to the SED fitting, this is one of the lowest-mass objects reported to possess a transitional disk. Including these new members, the fraction of disks is about 50% among the total Corona Australis population selected by the same criteria, lower than the 70% fraction reported earlier for this region. Even so, we find a ratio of transitional to primordial disks (45%) very similar to the value derived by previous authors. This ratio is higher than for solar-type stars (5-10%), suggesting that disk evolution is faster in the latter, and/or that the transitional disk stage is not such a short-lived step for very low-mass objects. However, this impression needs to be confirmed with better statistics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available