4.5 Article

Successful liquid storage of peripheral blood stem cells at subzero non-freezing temperature

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 30, Issue 11, Pages 777-784

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703692

Keywords

peripheral blood stem cell; dose-intensive chemotherapy; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; subzero non-freezing preservation; supercooled storage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although non-frozen storage of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) has been extensively studied and utilized clinically, the optimal storage conditions have not been determined. In order to improve the maintenance of clonogenic capacity during storage, we evaluated the feasibility of subzero non-freezing preservation of PBSC and attempted to determine the optimal conditions. Human PBSC were stored in different non-cryopreserved conditions. University of Wisconsin (UW) solution was used as the storage medium for PBSC. The stem cell integrity was optimally maintained when PBSC were preserved in a supercooled state at -2degreesC in UW solution without any cryoprotectants, and the highest values for nucleated cell survival (91.6%), CFU-GM survival (67.3%) and trypan blue viability (92%) were achieved at 72 h. CFU-GM survival in our storage conditions was significantly better than the survival achieved with hypothermic preservation in autologous serum and ACD-A solution at 4degreesC (67.3 +/- 9.2% vs 42.9 +/- 15.3%; P < 0.01) or cryopreservation at -80°C (67.3 ± 9.2% vs 52.7 ± 10.7%; P < 0.01). Thus, the combination of supercooling and UW solution was the optimal non-freezing method of preserving transplantable PBSC tested here. This method is of clinical utility in peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for its simplicity and storage efficiency, and has value as a short-term storage method for PBSC to support dose-intensive multicyclic chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available