4.6 Article

Properties and nature of Be stars 27. Orbital and recent long-term variations of the Pleiades Be star Pleione = BU Tauri

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 516, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913885

Keywords

stars: early-type; binaries: close; stars: emission-line, Be; stars: individual: BU Tau

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [205/06/0304, 205/08/H005, P209/10/0715]
  2. Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic [MSM0021620860]
  3. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [AV0Z10030501]
  4. ESA PECS [98058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radial-velocity variations of the H alpha emission measured on the steep wings of the H alpha line, prewhitened for the long-time changes, vary periodically with a period of 218.(d)025 +/- 0.(d)022, confirming the suspected binary nature of the bright Be star BU Tau, a member of the Pleiades cluster. The orbit seems to have a high eccentricity over 0.7, but we also briefly discuss the possibility that the true orbit is circular and that the eccentricity is spurious owing to the phase-dependent effects of the circumstellar matter. The projected angular separation of the spectroscopic orbit is large enough to allow the detection of the binary with large optical interferometers, provided the magnitude difference primary - secondary is not too large. Since our data cover the onset of a new shell phase up to development of a metallic shell spectrum, we also briefly discuss the recent long-term changes. We confirm the formation of a new envelope, coexisting with the previous one, at the onset of the new shell phase. We find that the full width at half maximum of the H alpha profile has been decreasing with time for both envelopes. In this connection, we briefly discuss Hirata's hypothesis of precessing gaseous disk and possible alternative scenarios of the observed long-term changes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available