4.2 Article

A Research Information Sheet for Practices (RISP): a tool to facilitate research participation

Journal

FAMILY PRACTICE
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 691-697

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/19.6.691

Keywords

clinical protocols; family practice; patient selection; research design; Research Information Sheet for Practices

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Practice teams may receive many requests to become involved in research studies. The information they receive may not necessarily provide the information they need to make a quick and informed decision about participation. Facilitating good decisions about research involvement has potential value for researchers, practitioners and research/development managers. Objective. To develop and pilot a template (RISP) for communicating information about research studies to practice teams. Methods. A participatory approach was used to develop the template involving primary care practitioners, researchers and research/development managers. The process of developing and piloting the template was recorded using an action research approach. Data were derived from documentation about policy, notes from participant observation and evaluation questionnaires. Results. The RISP template was used as a source of reference about practical implications of research and as a means to communicate information about research studies to practice teams. Practice respondents valued its use in enabling members of the practice team to quickly assimilate information about the proposed research study and in providing the basis for a well-informed decision about participation. Its value to record keeping (and to research governance) was anticipated at the planning stage but was not as yet strongly evident in responses from practice. Conclusion. The RISP template has been designed to reflect the concerns of researchers, primary care practitioners and research/development managers. It can contribute to the documentation required in support of research governance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available