4.7 Article

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) activation suppresses ischemic induction of Egr-1 and its inflammatory gene targets

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages 1861-1868

Publisher

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.02-0503com

Keywords

ischemia; reperfusion; early growth response-1; troglitazone

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL60900, HL59488, HL55397] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) is a nuclear receptor whose activation regulates metabolism and inflammation. Recent data indicate that the zinc finger transcription factor early growth response gene-1 (Egr-1) acts as a master switch for the inflammatory response in ischemic vessels. Experiments tested the hypothesis that activation of endogenous PPAR-gamma inhibits induction of Egr-1. Egr-1 is rapidly induced in murine lungs after ischemia-reperfusion, as well as in alveolar mononuclear phagocytes deprived of oxygen as an ischemic model. In vitro, the natural PPAR-gamma ligand (15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2)) and a PPAR-gamma activator (troglitazone), but not a PPAR-gamma activator (bezafibrate), strikingly diminished Egr-1 mRNA and protein expression and nuclear DNA binding activity corresponding to Egr-1. In vivo, treatment with troglitazone before ischemia prevented induction of Egr-1 and its target genes such as interleukin-1beta, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and macrophage inflammatory protein-2. As a consequence of PPAR-gamma activation, pulmonary leukostasis was decreased and oxygenation and overall survival were improved. Activation of PPAR-gamma suppresses activation of Egr-1 and its inflammatory gene targets and provides potent protection against ischemic pulmonary injury. These data reveal a new mechanism whereby PPAR-gamma activation may decrease tissue inflammation in response to an ischemic insult.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available