4.6 Article

Rotational excitation of ortho-H2O by para-H2 (j2=0, 2, 4, 6, 8) at high temperature

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 497, Issue 3, Pages 911-925

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200810680

Keywords

molecular data; molecular processes; ISM : molecules

Funding

  1. CNRS national program Physique et Chimie du Milieu Interstellaire
  2. FP6 Research Training Network Molecular Universe [MRTN-CT-2004-512302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. Our objective is to obtain the best possible set of rotational (de)-excitation state-to-state and effective rate coefficients for temperatures up to 1500 K. We present state-to-state rate coefficients among the 45 lowest levels of o-H2O with H-2(j(2) = 0) and Delta j(2) = 0, +2, as well as with H-2(j(2) = 2) and Delta j(2) = 0, -2. In addition and only for the 10 lowest energy levels of o-H2O, we provide state-to-state rate coefficients involving j(2) = 4 with Delta j(2) = 0, -2 and j(2) = 2 with Delta j(2) = +2. We give estimates of effective rate coefficients for j2 = 6, 8. Methods. Calculations are performed with the close coupling (CC) method over the whole energy range, using the same 5D potential energy surface (PES) as the one employed in our latest publication on water. We perform comparisons with coupled states (CS) calculations, with thermalized quasi-classical trajectory (QCT) calculations using the same PES and with previous quantum calculations obtained between T = 20 K and T = 140 K with a different PES. Results. We find that the CS approximation fares extremely badly even at high energy for j(2) different from zero. Comparisons with thermalized QCT calculations show large factors at intermediate temperatures and factors from 1 to 3 at high temperature for the strongest rate coefficients. Finally we stress that scaled collisional rate coefficients obtained with He cannot be used in place of collisional rate coefficients with H-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available