4.6 Article

Signatures of Alfven waves in the polar coronal holes as seen by EIS/Hinode

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 501, Issue 3, Pages L15-U489

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912242

Keywords

Sun: corona; Sun: oscillations; Sun: UV radiation; line: profiles; waves

Funding

  1. Royal Society/British Council
  2. STFC [PP/D001129/1]
  3. DLR
  4. CNES
  5. NASA
  6. ESA
  7. STFC [PP/E002242/1, PP/D002907/1, ST/H000429/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D002907/1, ST/H000429/1, PP/E002242/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. We diagnose the properties of the plume and interplume regions in a polar coronal hole and the role of waves in the acceleration of the solar wind. Aims. We attempt to detect whether Alfven waves are present in the polar coronal holes through variations in EUV line widths. Methods. Using spectral observations performed over a polar coronal hole region with the EIS spectrometer on Hinode, we study the variation in the line width and electron density as a function of height. We use the density sensitive line pairs of Fe XII 186.88 angstrom and 195.119 angstrom and Fe XIII 203.82 angstrom and 202.04 angstrom. Results. For the polar region, the line width data show that the nonthermal line-of-sight velocity increases from 26 kms(-1) at 10 '' above the limb to 42 kms(-1) some 150 '' (i.e. similar to 110 000 km) above the limb. The electron density shows a decrease from 3.3 x 10(9) cm(-3) to 1.9 x 10(8) cm(-3) over the same distance. Conclusions. These results imply that the nonthermal velocity is inversely proportional to the quadratic root of the electron density, in excellent agreement with what is predicted for undamped radially propagating linear Alfven waves. Our data provide signatures of Alfven waves in the polar coronal hole regions, which could be important for the acceleration of the solar wind.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available