4.6 Article

Chemical evolution of high-redshift radio galaxies

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 503, Issue 3, Pages 721-730

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811478

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: nuclei; quasars: emission lines; quasars: general

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15340059, 17253001, 19340046]
  2. Circle for the Promotion of Science and Engineering of Japan
  3. Research Promotion Award of Ehime University
  4. Italian Space Agency (ASI) [ASI-INAF I/016/07/0]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15340059] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present new deep optical spectra of 9 high-z radio galaxies (HzRGs) at z > 2.7 obtained with FORS2 on VLT. These rest-frame ultraviolet spectra are used to infer the metallicity of the narrow-line regions (NLRs) in order to investigate the chemical evolution of galaxies in the high-z universe. We focus mainly on the Civ/He II and C III]/C IV flux ratios that are sensitive to both the gas metallicity and ionization parameter. Although the N V emission has been widely used to infer the gas metallicity, it is often too weak to be measured accurately for NLRs. In combining our new spectra with data from the literature, we examine the possible redshift evolution of the NLR metallicity for 57 HzRGs at 1 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 4. Based on the comparison between the observed emission-line flux ratios and the results of our photoionization model calculations, we find no significant metallicity evolution in NLRs of HzRGs, up to z similar to 4. Our results imply that massive galaxies had almost completed their chemical evolution at much higher redshift (z > 5). Finally, although we detect strong N V emission lines in 5 HzRGs at z > 2.7, we point out that high N V/He II ratios are not indicative of high metallicities but correspond to high ionization parameters of gas clouds in NLRs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available