4.6 Article

Interference due to pain following spinal cord injury: important predictors and impact on quality of life

Journal

PAIN
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages 231-242

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00069-6

Keywords

spinal cord injury; pain; quality of life; life satisfaction

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [T32 HD 07420-10] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [H133N 50009] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two studies were designed to examine important predictors of pain following spinal cord injury (SCI), and the impact of pain on self-reported quality of life (QOL). Pain was defined as interference in dav-to-day activities secondary to pain. In order to determine risk factors associated with the development of pain interference, Study 1 examined the predictive validity of multiple demographic, medical, and QOL variables at year 1 post-SCI to self-reported pain interference 2 years post-injury. Results showed that middle age (30-59-year-olds), lower self-reported mental health. and pain interference at 1 year post-SCI were the most important unique predictors of pain interference 2 years post-SCI. In Study 2. participants were separated into four groups; (1) those pain-free at years 1 and 2, (2) those pain-free at year 1 and in pain at year 2, (3) those in pain at year 1 and pain-free at year 2, and (4) those in pain at years 1 and 2. Results showed that only those experiencing a change in pain interference status reported a change in QOL. More specifically. those developing pain interference (group 2) from year 1 to year 2 reported decreased life satisfaction. physical health, and mental health, whereas, those with resolving pain interference from year 1 to year 2 reported an increase in these same domains, Unexpectedly, change in pain interference status was unrelated to change in self-reported handicap. Implications and future directions are discussed. (C) 2002 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available