4.6 Article

Resolving the asymmetric inner wind region of the yellow hypergiant IRC+10420 with VLTI/AMBER in low and high spectral resolution mode

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 507, Issue 1, Pages 301-316

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911723

Keywords

instrumentation: high angular resolution; instrumentation: interferometers; stars: circumstellar matter; stars: individual: IRC+10420; stars: mass-loss; stars: supergiants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. IRC + 10420 is a massive evolved star belonging to the group of yellow hypergiants. Currently, this star is rapidly evolving through the Hertzprung-Russell diagram, crossing the so-called yellow void. IRC + 10420 is suffering from intensive mass loss which led to the formation of an extended dust shell. Moreover, the dense stellar wind of IRC + 10420 is subject to strong line emission. Aims. Our goal was to probe the photosphere and the innermost circumstellar environment of IRC + 10420, to measure the size of its continuum-as well as the Br gamma line-emitting region on milliarcsecond scales, and to search for evidence of an asymmetric distribution of IRC + 10420's dense, circumstellar gas. Methods. We obtained near-infrared long-baseline interferometry of IRC + 10420 with the AMBER instrument of ESO's Very Large Telescope Interferometer (VLTI). The measurements were carried out in May/June 2007 and May 2008 in low-spectral resolution mode in the JHK bands using three auxillary telescopes (ATs) at projected baselines ranging from 30 to 96 m, and in October 2008 in high-spectral resolution mode in the K band around the Br gamma emission line using three unit telescopes (UTs) with projected baselines between 54 and 129 m. The high-spectral resolution mode observations were analyzed by means of radiative transfer modeling using CMFGEN and the 2D Busche & Hillier codes. Results. For the first time, we have been able to absolutely calibrate the H-and K-band data and, thus, to determine the angular size of IRC + 10420's continuum-and Br gamma line-emitting regions. We found that both the low resolution differential and closure phases are zero within the uncertainty limits across all three bands. In the high-spectral resolution observations, the visibilities show a noticeable drop across the Br gamma line on all three baselines. We found differential phases up to -25 degrees in the redshifted part of the Br gamma line and a non-zero closure phase close to the line center. The calibrated visibilities were corrected for AMBER's limited field-of-view to appropriately account for the flux contribution of IRC + 10420's extended dust shell. From our low-spectral resolution AMBER data we derived FWHM Gaussian sizes of 1.05 +/- 0.07 and 0.98 +/- 0.10 mas for IRC + 10420's continuum-emitting region in the H and K bands, respectively. From the high-spectral resolution data, we obtained a FWHM Gaussian size of 1.014 +/- 0.010 mas in the K-band continuum. The Br gamma-emitting region can be fitted with a geometric ring model with a diameter of 4.18(-0.09)(+0.19) mas, which is approximately 4 times the stellar size. The geometric model also provides some evidence that the Br gamma line-emitting region is elongated towards a position angle of 36 degrees, well aligned with the symmetry axis of the outer reflection nebula. Assuming an unclumped wind and a luminosity of 6 x 10(5) L(circle dot), the spherical radiative transfer modeling with CMGFEN yields a current mass-loss rate of 1.5-2.0 x 10(-5) M(circle dot) yr(-1) based on the Br gamma equivalent width. However, the spherical CMFGEN model poorly reproduces the observed line shape, blueshift, and extension, definitively showing that the IRC + 10420 outflow is asymmetric. Our 2D radiative transfer modeling shows that the blueshifted Br gamma emission and the shape of the visibility across the emission line can be explained with an asymmetric bipolar outflow with a high density contrast from pole to equator (8-16), where the redshifted light is substantially diminished.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available