Journal
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 24, Issue 18, Pages 977-982Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638280210152021
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The strong family relationships and different cultural backgrounds of the majority world countries motivate us to conclude that a 'family centred deliberative process' based on accommodation and negotiation is more acceptable, reliable and implementable in these communities. Our suggested model of decision making is more convenient, particularly in cases where competency is compromised by cognitive dysfunction, political or religious restrictions. To insist on absolute autonomy beyond such borders could be counter-productive for both patients and health care personnel. However, the need for further research is paramount, as a deeper understanding of the various cultures and subcultures is essential for developing a more useful structural framework for rehabilitation. The same holds true for the minority world countries, where the diverse and dynamic paradoxes within the 'autonomy paradigm' will ensure its safe application and survival in such communities.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available