4.6 Article

Can angular momentum loss cause the period change of NN Serpentis?

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 499, Issue 1, Pages L1-L3

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911638

Keywords

binaries: eclipsing; pulsars: individual: N Serpentis; stars: evolution; white dwarfs; stars: winds, outflows

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10873011]
  2. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NN Ser is a non mass-transferring pre-cataclysmic variable containing a white dwarf with a mass of similar to 0.5 M(circle dot) and an M dwarf secondary star with a mass of similar to 0.2 M(circle dot). Based on the data obtained with the high-speed CCD camera ULTRACAM, it was observed that the orbital period of NN Ser is decreasing, which may be caused by a genuine angular momentum loss or by the presence of a third body. However, neither gravitational radiation nor magnetic braking can fully account for the period change of NN Ser. Here, we search for a mechanism which could drain the angular momentum from NN Ser. We propose that a fossil circumbinary disk (CB disk) around the binary may have been established at the end of the common envelope phase, and the tidal torques caused by the gravitational interaction between the disk and the binary can efficiently extract the orbital angular momentum from the system. We find that only if M dwarf has an ultra-high wind loss rate of similar to 10(-10) M(circle dot) yr(-1), and a large fraction (delta similar to 10%) of wind loss is fed into the CB disk, can the loss rates of angular momentum via the CB disk explain the period change observed in NN Ser. Such a wind loss rate and delta-value seem to be highly unlikely. Hence it seems that the presence of a third body in a long orbit around the binary might account for the changing period of NN Ser.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available