4.3 Article

Soil-vegetation relationships on a banded ironstone 'island', Carajas Plateau, Brazilian Eastern Amazonia

Journal

ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages 2097-2110

Publisher

ACAD BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
DOI: 10.1590/0001-376520152014-0106

Keywords

Amazon Forest; canga; Carajas; ferruginous campo rupestre; iron formation; laterite

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vegetation and soil properties of an iron-rich canga (laterite) island on the largest outcrop of banded-iron formation in Serra de Carajas (eastern Amazonia, Brazil) were studied along a topographic gradient (738-762 m asl), and analyzed to test the hypothesis that soil chemical and physical attributes play a key role in the structure and floristic composition of these plant communities. Soil and vegetation were sampled in eight replicate plots within each of the four vegetation types. Surface (0-10 cm) soil samples from each plot were analyzed for basic cations, N, P and plant species density for all species was recorded. CCA ordination analysis showed a strong separation between forest and non-forest sites on the first axis, and between herbaceous and shrubby campo rupestre on the second axis. The four vegetation types shared few plant species, which was attributed to their distinctive soil environments and filtering of their constituent species by chemical, physical and hydrological constraints. Thus; we can infer that Edaphic (pedological) factors are crucial in explaining the types and distributions of campo rupestre vegetation associated with ferruginous ironstone uplands (Canga) in Carajas, eastern Amazonia, therefore the soil properties are the main drivers of vegetation composition and structure on these ironstone islands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available