4.6 Article

Doppler factors, Lorentz factors and viewing angles for quasars, BL Lacertae objects and radio galaxies

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 494, Issue 2, Pages 527-537

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811150

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: jets; radio continuum: galaxies; radiation mechanisms: non-thermal; galaxies: quasars: general

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [212656, 210338]
  2. MOJAVE
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [210338, 210338] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. We have calculated variability Doppler boosting factors, Lorentz factors, and viewing angles for a large sample of sources by using total flux density observations at 22 and 37 GHz and VLBI data. Methods. We decomposed the flux curves into exponential flares and determined the variability brightness temperatures of the fastest flares. By assuming the same intrinsic brightness temperature for each source, we calculated the Doppler boosting factors for 87 sources. In addition we used new apparent jet speed data to calculate the Lorentz factors and viewing angles for 67 sources. Results. We find that all quasars in our sample are Doppler-boosted and that the Doppler boosting factors of BL Lacertae objects are lower than of quasars. The new Lorentz factors are about twice as high as in earlier studies, which is mainly due to higher apparent speeds in our analyses. The jets of BL Lacertae objects are slower than of quasars. There are some extreme sources with very high derived Lorentz factors of the order of a hundred. These high Lorentz factors could be real. It is also possible that the sources exhibit such rapid flares that the fast variations have remained undetected in monitoring programmes, or else the sources have a complicated jet structure that is not amenable to our simple analysis. Almost all the sources are seen in a small viewing angle of less than 20 degrees. Our results follow the predictions of basic unification schemes for AGN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available