4.6 Article

WSRT Faraday tomography of the Galactic ISM at λ ∼ 0.86 m I. The GEMINI data set at (I, b) = (181°, 20°)

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 494, Issue 2, Pages 611-622

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078912

Keywords

magnetic fields; radio continuum: ISM; ISM: magnetic fields; techniques: polarimetric; polarization

Funding

  1. The Netherlands Foundation for Research in Astronomy (NFRA)
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  3. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. We investigate the properties of the Galactic ISM by applying Faraday tomography to a radio polarization data set in the direction of the Galactic anti-centre. Methods. We address the problem of missing large-scale structure in our data, and show that this does not play an important role for the results we present. Results. The main peak of the Faraday depth spectra in our data set is not measurably resolved for about 8% of the lines of sight. An unresolved peak indicates a separation between the regions with Faraday rotation and synchrotron emission. However, cosmic rays pervade the ISM, and synchrotron emission would therefore also be produced where there is Faraday rotation. We suggest that the orientation of the magnetic field can separate the two effects. By modelling the thermal electron contribution to the Faraday depth, we map the strength of the magnetic field component along the line of sight. Polarized point sources in our data set have rotation measures that are comparable to the Faraday depths of the diffuse emission in our data. Our Faraday depth maps show narrow canals of low polarized intensity. We conclude that depolarization over the telescope beam produces at least some of these canals. Finally, we investigate the properties of one conspicuous region in this data set and argue that it is created by a decrease in line-of-sight depolarization compared to its surroundings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available