4.7 Article

Therapy with imatinib mesylate (Glivec) preceding allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in relapsed or refractory Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph plus ALL)

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 2358-2365

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402770

Keywords

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph plus ALL); BCR-ABL; tyrosine kinase; imatinib mesylate (Glivec); allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Imatinib has pronounced antileukemic activity in Ph+ALL, although responses are usually short. To determine whether imatinib may facilitate allogeneic SCT in relapsed or refractory Ph+ALL, we evaluated 46 consecutive, not previously transplanted patients who were enrolled in phase 11 studies of imatinib. Of 30 patients eligible for SCT, 22 (73%) were actually transplanted. Ten patients were in complete hematologic remission (CHR) (n = 5) or had a complete marrow response (CMR) (n = 5) at the time of SCT, 12 patients had again relapsed or were refractory. After SCT, 18 patients were in complete remission, one patient was refractory, three patients died prior to response assessment. Seven patients (32%) are in ongoing complete remission with a median follow-up of 9.4 (range 1.7-23.8) months. Seven patients (32%) relapsed a median of 5.2 months after SCT. Transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 36%. Probability of disease-free survival (DFS) is 25.5 +/- 9.8% overall and 51.4 +/- 17.7% when SCT was performed in CHR or CMR, compared with 8.3 +/- 8% for SCT during overt leukemia (P = 0.06). In conclusion, imatinib is a well-tolerated salvage therapy prior to allogeneic SCT in patients with Ph+ALL, but requires that SCT be performed within a few weeks of starting treatment to avoid resistance. Disease status at time of transplantation is an important determinant of DFS and TRM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available