Journal
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 215-223Publisher
SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020770831134
Keywords
factor analysis; MOCI; categorical; IRT; WLS
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
It is well known that traditional factor analytic methods are designed for use with continuous data, and suboptimal for items with 2 response options (i.e., binary items). Nevertheless, traditional methods have been employed in all previous assessment of the dimensionality of the Maudsley Obsessional Compulsive Inventory (MOCI), a true/false measure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (R. J. Hodgson & S. Rachman, 1977). The aim of this paper is to illustrate 2 techniques that are more suitable for factor-analyzing binary items than traditional methods, through application to the MOCI (n = 1,080). Computer files for use with the TESTFACT (D. Wilson, R. L. Wood, & R. Gibbons, 1991) and Mplus (Muthen & Muthen, 1998) computer programs are provided. Results from an inappropriately applied principal axis factor analysis are presented for comparison, and factor structures, loadings, and interfactor correlations are compared across methods.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available