4.6 Article

Angular distribution for the elastic scattering of electrons from Ar+ (3s23p5 2P) above the first inelastic threshold -: art. no. 062706

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.062706

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The measured-angular differential cross section (PCS) for the elastic scattering of electrons from Ar+(3s(2)3p(5) P-2) at the collision energy of 16 eV is presented. By solving the Hartree-Fock equations, we calculate the corresponding theoretical DCS including the coupling between the orbital angular momenta and spin of the incident electron and those of the target ion and, also relaxation effects. Since the collision energy, is above one inelastic threshold for the transition 3s(2)3p(5 2)P-3s3P(6 2)S; we consider the effects on the DCS of inelastic absorption processes and elastic resonances. The measurements deviate significantly from the Rutherford cross section over the full angular range observed, especially in the region of a deep minimum centered, at approximately 75degrees. Our theory and an uncoupled, unrelaxed method using a local, spherically symmetric potential by, Manson [Phys. Rev. 182, 97 (1969)] both reproduce the overall shape of the measured DCS, although the coupled Hartree-Fock approach describes the depth of the minimum more accurately. The, minimum is shallower in the present theory owing to our lower average value,for the d-wave non-Coulomb phase shift sigma(2), which is due to the high sensitivity of sigma(2) to the-different scattering potentials used in the two models. The present measurements and calculations therefore show the importance of including coupling and relaxation effects when accurately modeling electron-ion collisions-The phase shifts obtained by fitting to the measurements are compared with the values of Manson and the present method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available