4.6 Article

Large-scale mass balance effects of blowing snow and surface sublimation -: art. no. 4679

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 107, Issue D23, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2001JD001251

Keywords

blowing snow; Mackenzie Basin; mass balance; snow; sublimation; water budget

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[1] This study examines the effects of surface sublimation and blowing snow on the surface mass balance on a global and basin scale using the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA15) data at a resolution of 2.5degrees that span the years 1979-1993. The combined processes of surface and blowing snow sublimation are estimated to remove 29 mm yr(-1) snow-water equivalent (swe) over Antarctica, disposing about 17 to 20% of its annual precipitation. In the Northern Hemisphere, these processes are generally less important in continental areas than over the frozen Arctic Ocean, where surface and blowing snow sublimation deplete upward of 100 mm yr(-1) swe. Areas with frequent blowing snow episodes, such as the coastal regions of Antarctica and the Arctic Ocean, are prone to a mass transport >100 Mg m(-1) yr(-1). Although important locally, values of the divergence of mass through wind redistribution are generally 2 orders of magnitude less than surface and blowing snow sublimation when evaluated over large areas. For the entire Mackenzie River Basin of Canada, surface sublimation remains the dominant sink of mass as it removes 29 mm yr(-1) swe, or about 7% of the watershed's annual precipitation. Although the first of its kind, this study provides only a first-order estimate of the contribution of surface sublimation and blowing snow to the surface mass balance because of limitations with the data set and some uncertainties in the blowing snow process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available