4.7 Article

De novo methylation of the p16INK4A gene in early preneoplastic liver and tumors induced by folate/methyl deficiency in rats

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 187, Issue 1-2, Pages 69-75

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3835(02)00408-1

Keywords

p16 gene; DNA methylation; hepatocarcinogenesis; rat folate/methyl deficiency

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have established that chronic dietary insufficiency of the lipotropic nutrients choline and methionine with or without chemical initiation is hepatocarcinogenic in the rat and certain mouse strains. In the present study, the folate/methyl-deficient model of multistage hepatocarcinogenesis was used to evaluate progressive in vivo changes in p16 promoter methylation in both preneoplastic and tumor tissues. Previous studies using this model have demonstrated stage-dependent alterations in genome-wide and p53 gene-specific methylation. In the present study, we used highly sensitive methylation specific PCR (MSP) to determine time of appearance of methylated sequences within p16 promoter. In addition, methylation-sensitive single nucleotide primer extension methodology was applied to determine methylation status of the remaining CpG sites within amplified methylated alleles. Using this approach, extensive methylation in p16 promoter was found in 100% of tumors, but the pattern of methylation varied depending on tumor type. The incidence and extent of de novo methylation in the CpG island of the p16 promoter increased with tumor progression. To further explore the evolution of p16 gene hypermethylation, we examined the appearance and progression of site-specific de novo methylation during early preneoplasia. Our data show that site-specific de novo methylation of 5' CpG island of p16 gene precedes tumor development and undergoes dynamic expansion during tumor progression. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available