4.7 Article

Reduced myocardial and systemic L-arginine uptake in heart failure

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 91, Issue 12, Pages 1198-1203

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000047506.52381.90

Keywords

heart failure; nitric oxide; amino acids; radioisotopes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Altered nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability has been ascribed an important role in the pathophysiology of congestive heart failure (CHF). In the peripheral vasculature, we recently demonstrated a depression of L-arginine transport in association with pharmacological evidence of reduced endothelial function. In contrast, increased myocardial NO generation has been proposed to account for a component of the reduced myocardial contractility in CHF, although this remains controversial. We determined the whole body clearance rate and cardiac fractional extraction of L-arginine during a steady-state intravenous infusion of [H-3]L-arginine (300 nCi/min) in 9 healthy control subjects and 7 patients with moderate to severe CHF. In patients with CHF, there was a 30% reduction in the transcardiac extraction of [H-3]L-arginine compared with controls (P<0.05), which was accompanied by a trend toward reduced [H-3]L-citrulline release (P=0.06). In conjunction, the systemic clearance rate of [H-3]L-arginine was significantly lower in patients with CHF (778 +/- 148 versus 1278 +/- 144 mL/min, P<0.05). In association with these biochemical indices, we observed a 38% reduction (P<0.05) in the mRNA expression of the cationic amino acid transporter CAT-1 in ventricular myocardial samples from patients with CHF compared with healthy unused donor myocardium, whereas myocardial NOS enzymatic activity and NOS protein were unchanged. These data indicate the presence of a significant reduction in the myocardial uptake of L-arginine in patients with CHF. Furthermore, this abnormality seems to be part of a systemic downregulation of L-arginine transport.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available