4.6 Article

Cellular mechanisms of orexin actions on paraventricular nucleus neurones in rat hypothalamus

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 545, Issue 3, Pages 855-867

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.030049

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using whole-cell patch clamp techniques we have examined the cellular mechanisms underlying the effects of orexin A (OX-A) on electrophysiologically identified magnocellular and parvocellular neurones in the rat hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN). The majority of magnocellular neurones (67 %) showed concentration-dependent, reversible depolarizations in response to OX-A. These effects were abolished in tetrodotoxin (TTX), suggesting them to be indirect effects on this population of neurones. OX-A also caused increases in excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) frequency and amplitude in magnocellular neurones. The former effects were again blocked in TTX while increases in mini-EPSC amplitude remained. Depolarizing effects of OX-A on magnocellular neurones were also found to be abolished by kynurenic acid, supporting the conclusion that these effects were the result of activation of a glutamate interneurone. Parvocellular neurones (73 % of those tested) also showed concentration-dependent, reversible depolarizations in response to OX-A. In contrast to magnocellular neurones, these effects were maintained in TTX, indicating direct effects of OX-A on this population of neurones. Voltage clamp analysis using slow voltage ramps demonstrated that OX-A enhanced a non-selective cationic conductance with a reversal potential of -40 mV in parvocellular neurones, effects which probably explain the depolarizing effects of this peptide in this subopoulation of PVN neurones. These studies have identified separate cellular mechanisms through which OX-A influences the excitability of magnocellular and parvocellular PVN neurones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available