3.8 Article

Interstitial lung disease in polymyositis and dermatomyositis

Journal

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 614-622

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/art.10794

Keywords

polymyositis; dermatomyositis; interstitial lung disease; anti-Jo-1 antibody

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To assess prevalence, characteristics, and long-term outcome of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM). To determine predictive variables of ILD course in PM/DM, and to define both clinical and biochemical features associated with ILD onset in PM/DM. Methods. The medical records of 156 consecutive PM/DM patients in 3 medical centers were reviewed. Results. Thirty-six PM/DM patients (23.1%) developed ILD. We observed that 19.4% of patients with ILD had resolution of pulmonary disorders, whereas 25% experienced ILD deterioration. Morbidity and mortality rates were as high as 13.9% and 36.4%, respectively, in PM/DM patients with ILD. Parameters of PM/DM that related to ILD poor outcome were identified as follows: Hamman-Rich-like pattern, initial diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide <45%, neutrophil alveolitis, and histologic usual interstitial pneumonia. Additionally, for the group with ILD, polyarthritis, higher values of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, presence of anti-Jo-1 antibody, and characteristic microangiopathy were significantly more frequent. Conclusion. Our series underlines the high frequency of ILD in PM/DM patients, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality rates. It also indicates that PM/DM patients should routinely be screened for ILD, even those patients without anti-Jo-1 antibody, because 69% of our ILD patients were seronegative for the anti-Jo-1 antibody. Our findings further suggest that PM/DM patients presenting with factors predictive of ILD poor outcome may require more aggressive therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available