4.7 Article

The luminosity-metallicity relation, effective yields, and metal loss in spiral and irregular galaxies

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 581, Issue 2, Pages 1019-1031

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/344301

Keywords

galaxies : abundances; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : irregular; galaxies : spiral

Ask authors/readers for more resources

I present results on the correlation between galaxy mass, luminosity, and metallicity for a sample of spiral and irregular galaxies having well-measured abundance profiles, distances, and rotation speeds. Additional data for low surface brightness galaxies from the literature are also included for comparison. These data are combined to study the metallicity-luminosity and metallicity rotation speed correlations for spiral and irregular galaxies. The metallicity-luminosity correlation shows its familiar form for these galaxies, a roughly uniform change in the average present-day O/H abundance of about a factor of 100 over 11 mag in B luminosity. However, the O/H-V-rot relation shows a change in slope at a rotation speed of about 125 km s(-1). At faster V rot, there appears to be no relation between average metallicity and rotation speed. At lower V rot, the metallicity correlates with rotation speed. This change in behavior could be the result of increasing loss of metals from the smaller galaxies in supernova-driven winds. This idea is tested by looking at the variation in effective yield, derived from observed abundances and gas fractions assuming closed box chemical evolution. The effective yields derived for spiral and irregular galaxies increase by a factor of 10-20 from V-rot approximate to 5 to 300 km s(-1), asymptotically increasing to approximately constant y(eff) for V-rot greater than or similar to 150 km s(-1). The trend suggests that galaxies with V-rot less than or similar to 100-150 km s(-1) may lose a large fraction of their supernova ejecta, while galaxies above this value tend to retain metals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available