4.7 Article

Dynamical state of superclusters of galaxies:: do superclusters expand or have they started to collapse?

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 337, Issue 4, Pages 1417-1425

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.06016.x

Keywords

galaxies : clusters : general; cosmology : theory; dark matter; large-scale structure of Universe

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the dynamical state of superclusters in Lambda cold dark matter cosmological models, where the density parameter Omega(0) = 0.2-0.4 and sigma(8) (the rms fluctuation on the 8 h(-1) Mpc scale) is 0.7-0.9. To study the non-linear regime, we use N-body simulations. We define superclusters as maxima of the density field smoothed on the scale R = 10 h(-1) Mpc. Smaller superclusters defined by the density field smoothed on the scale R = 5 h(-1) Mpc are also investigated. We find the relations between the radially averaged peculiar velocity and the density contrast in the superclusters for different cosmological models. These relations can be used to estimate the dynamical state of a supercluster on the basis of its density contrast. In the simulations studied, all the superclusters defined with the 10 h(-1) Mpc smoothing are expanding by the present epoch. Only a small fraction of the superclusters defined with R = 5 h(-1) Mpc have already reached their turnaround radius and these superclusters have started to collapse. In the model with Omega(0) = 0.3 and sigma(8) = 0.9, the number density of objects that have started to collapse is 5 x 10(-6) h(3) Mpc(-3). The results for superclusters in the N-body simulations are compared with the spherical collapse model. We find that the radial peculiar velocities in N-body simulations are systematically smaller than those predicted by the spherical collapse model (similar to25 per cent for the R = 5 h(-1) Mpc superclusters).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available