4.6 Article

THE PREMATURE FORMATION OF HIGH-REDSHIFT GALAXIES

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 147, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/120

Keywords

cosmology: observations; cosmology: theory; early universe; galaxies: general; large-scale structure of universe

Funding

  1. Amherst College through a John Woodruff Simpson Lectureship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations with WFC3/IR on the Hubble Space Telescope and the use of gravitational lensing techniques have facilitated the discovery of galaxies as far back as z similar to 10-12, a truly remarkable achievement. However, this rapid emergence of high-z galaxies, barely similar to 200 Myr after the transition from Population III star formation to Population II, appears to be in conflict with the standard view of how the early universe evolved. This problem has much in common with the better known (and probably related) premature appearance of supermassive black holes at z greater than or similar to 6. It is difficult to understand how similar to 10(9) M-circle dot black holes could have appeared so quickly after the big bang without invoking non-standard accretion physics and the formation of massive seeds, neither of which is seen in the local universe. In earlier work, we showed that the appearance of high-z quasars could instead be understood more reasonably in the context of the R-h = ct universe, which does not suffer from the same time compression issues as.CDM does at early epochs. Here, we build on that work by demonstrating that the evolutionary growth of primordial galaxies was consistent with the current view of how the first stars formed, but only with the timeline afforded by the R-h = ct cosmology. We also show that the growth of high-z quasars was mutually consistent with that of the earliest galaxies, though it is not yet clear whether the former grew from 5-20 M-circle dot seeds created in Population III or Population II supernova explosions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available