4.6 Article

ABSOLUTE PROPERTIES OF THE ECLIPSING BINARY SYSTEM AQ SERPENTIS: A STRINGENT TEST OF CONVECTIVE CORE OVERSHOOTING IN STELLAR EVOLUTION MODELS

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 147, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/2/36

Keywords

binaries: eclipsing; stars: evolution; stars: fundamental parameters

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-1007992]
  2. CNPq
  3. FAPEMIG
  4. CAPES
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1007992] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report differential photometric observations and radial-velocity measurements of the detached, 1.69 day period, double-lined eclipsing binary AQ Ser. Accurate masses and radii for the components are determined to better than 1.8% and 1.1%, respectively, and are M-1 = 1.417 +/- 0.021 M circle dot, M-2 = 1.346 +/- 0.024 M circle dot, R-1 = 2.451 +/- 0.027 R circle dot, and R-2 = 2.281 +/- 0.014 R circle dot. The temperatures are 6340 +/- 100 K (spectral type F6) and 6430 +/- 100 K (F5), respectively. Both stars are considerably evolved, such that predictions from stellar evolution theory are particularly sensitive to the degree of extra mixing above the convective core (overshoot). The component masses are different enough to exclude a location in the H-R diagram past the point of central hydrogen exhaustion, which implies the need for extra mixing. Moreover, we find that current main-sequence models are unable to match the observed properties at a single age even when allowing the unknown metallicity, mixing length parameter, and convective overshooting parameter to vary freely and independently for the two components. The age of the more massive star appears systematically younger. AQ Ser and other similarly evolved eclipsing binaries showing the same discrepancy highlight an outstanding and largely overlooked problem with the description of overshooting in current stellar theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available