4.0 Article

C-reactive protein as a predictor for incident diabetes mellitus among middle-aged men -: Results from the MONICA Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984-1998

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 163, Issue 1, Pages 93-99

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.1.93

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Previous studies have suggested that lowgrade systemic inflammation is involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Objective: To investigate the association between Creactive protein (CRP), the classic acute-phase protein, and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus among middle-aged men. Methods: A total of 2052 initially nondiabetic men aged 45 to 74 years who participated in 1 of the 3 MONICA (Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Augsburg surveys between 1984 and 1995 were,followed up for an average of 7.2 years. Incidence, of diabetes was assessed by questionnaire mailed to pariicipants in 1998. High-sensitive CRP was measured by an immunoradiometric assay. Results: A total of 101 cases of incident diabetes occurred during the follow-up period. The age-standardized incidence rate was 6.9 per 1000 person-years. Men with CRP levels in the highest quartile (CRP greater than or equal to2.91 mg/L) had a, 2.7 times higher risk of developing diabetes (95% confidence interval, 1.4-5.2) compared with men in the lowest quartile (CRPless than or equal to0.67 mg/L) in a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age and survey. After further adjustment for body mass index, smoking, and systolic blood pressure, the observed association was significantly reduced and became nonsignificant. Conclusions: Low-grade systemic inflammation is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged men. Inflammation could be one mechanism by which known risk factors for diabetes mellitus, such as obesity, smoking, and hypertension, promote the development of diabetes mellitus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available