4.6 Article

COOL YOUNG STARS IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE: β PICTORIS AND AB DORADUS MOVING GROUP CANDIDATES

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 143, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/143/4/80

Keywords

open clusters and associations: individual (Beta Pictoris, AB Doradus); stars: kinematics and dynamics; stars: pre-main sequence

Funding

  1. NSF [AST 09-07745, AST 06-07757, AST 09-08406]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [908406] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As part of our continuing effort to identify new, low-mass members of nearby, young moving groups (NYMGs), we present a list of young, low-mass candidates in the northern hemisphere. We used our proven proper-motion selection procedure and ROSAT X-ray and GALEX-UV activity indicators to identify 204 young stars as candidate members of the beta Pictoris and AB Doradus NYMGs. Definitive membership assignment of a given candidate will require a measurement of its radial velocity and distance. We present a simple system of indices to characterize the young candidates and help prioritize follow-up observations. New group members identified in this candidate list will be high priority targets for (1) exoplanet direct imaging searches, (2) the study of post-T-Tauri astrophysics, (3) understanding recent local star formation, and (4) the study of local galactic kinematics. Information available now allows us to identify eight likely new members in the list. Two of these, a late-K and an early-M dwarf, we find to be likely members of the beta Pic group. The other six stars are likely members of the AB Dor moving group. These include an M dwarf triple system, and three very cool objects that may be young brown dwarfs, making them the lowest-mass, isolated objects proposed in the AB Dor moving group to date.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available