4.6 Article

KEPLER INPUT CATALOG: PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATION AND STELLAR CLASSIFICATION

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 142, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/112

Keywords

catalogs; methods: data analysis; surveys; techniques: photometric

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX10AG02A]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. NASA with the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory [NCC-1390]
  4. NASA [NNX10AG02A, 134272] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe the photometric calibration and stellar classification methods used by the Stellar Classification Project to produce the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC). The KIC is a catalog containing photometric and physical data for sources in the Kepler mission field of view; it is used by the mission to select optimal targets. Four of the visible-light (g, r, i, z) magnitudes used in the KIC are tied to Sloan Digital Sky Survey magnitudes; the fifth (D51) is an AB magnitude calibrated to be consistent with Castelli & Kurucz (CK) model atmosphere fluxes. We derived atmospheric extinction corrections from hourly observations of secondary standard fields within the Kepler field of view. For these filters and extinction estimates, repeatability of absolute photometry for stars brighter than magnitude 15 is typically 2%. We estimated stellar parameters {T(eff), log(g), log(Z), E(B-V)} using Bayesian posterior probability maximization to match observed colors to CK stellar atmosphere models. We applied Bayesian priors describing the distribution of solar-neighborhood stars in the color-magnitude diagram, in log(Z), and in height above the galactic plane. Several comparisons with samples of stars classified by other means indicate that for 4500 K <= T(eff) <= 6500 K, our classifications are reliable within about +/- 200 K and 0.4 dex in log(g) for dwarfs, with somewhat larger log(g) uncertainties for giants. It is difficult to assess the reliability of our log(Z) estimates, but there is reason to suspect that it is poor, particularly at extreme T(eff). Comparisons between the CK models and observed colors are generally satisfactory with some exceptions, notably for stars cooler than 4500 K. Of great importance for the Kepler mission, for T(eff) <= 5400 K, comparison with asteroseismic results shows that the distinction between main-sequence stars and giants is reliable with about 98% confidence. Larger errors in log(g) occur for warmer stars, for which our filter set provides inadequate gravity diagnostics. The KIC is available through the MAST data archive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available