4.6 Article

THE CARNEGIE SUPERNOVA PROJECT: SECOND PHOTOMETRY DATA RELEASE OF LOW-REDSHIFT TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 142, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/5/156

Keywords

galaxies: distances and redshifts; supernovae: general

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-0306969, AST-0908886, AST-0607438, AST-1008343]
  2. Danish National Research Foundation
  3. CONICYT [1060808]
  4. Centro de Astrofisica FONDAP [15010003]
  5. Centro BASAL CATA [PFB-06]
  6. Millennium Center for Supernova Science [P06-045-F]
  7. TABASGO Foundation
  8. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  9. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1008343] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23740175] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Carnegie Supernova Project (CSP) was a five-year observational survey conducted at Las Campanas Observatory that obtained, among other things, high-quality light curves of similar to 100 low-redshift Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). Presented here is the second data release of nearby SN Ia photometry consisting of 50 objects, with a subset of 45 having near-infrared follow-up observations. Thirty-three objects have optical pre-maximum coverage with a subset of 15 beginning at least five days before maximum light. In the near-infrared, 27 objects have coverage beginning before the epoch of B-band maximum, with a subset of 13 beginning at least five days before maximum. In addition, we present results of a photometric calibration program to measure the CSP optical (uBgVri) bandpasses with an accuracy of similar to 1%. Finally, we report the discovery of a second SN Ia, SN 2006ot, similar in its characteristics to the peculiar SN 2006bt.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available