4.8 Article

Effect of erythropoietin on exercise capacity in patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages 294-299

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000044914.42696.6A

Keywords

exercise; heart failure; growth substances

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [5 M01 RR00645] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) are frequently anemic. An increase in hemoglobin could enhance exercise performance by increasing oxygen delivery. We investigated the effect of erythropoietin (EPO) on exercise performance in anemic patients with CHF. Methods and Results-Twenty-six anemic patients aged 57+/-11 years were randomized to receive EPO (15 000 to 30 000 IU per week) or placebo for 3 months. Parameters measured at baseline and end therapy included blood parameters (hemoglobin, hematocrit, plasma volume), exercise parameters (peak oxygen consumption [(V) over dot O-2], exercise duration, 6-minute walk), muscle aerobic metabolism (half-time of (V) over dot O-2 and near infrared recovery), and forearm vasodilatory function. EPO was well tolerated by all patients. Twelve patients in the EPO group felt improvement versus 1 in the placebo group (P<0.05). There were significant increases in hemoglobin (11.0+/-0.5 to 14.3+/-1.0 g/dL, P<0.05), peak (V) over dot O-2 (11.0+/-1.8 to 12.7+/-2.8 mL . min(-1) . kg(-1), P<0.05) and exercise duration (590+/-107 to 657+/-119 s, P<0.004) in the EPO group but no significant changes in the control group. Resting and hyperemic forearm vascular resistance and indices of the rate of muscle oxidative capacity were unchanged in both groups. Conclusion-EPO significantly enhances exercise capacity in patients with CHF. One mechanism of improvement in (V) over dot O-2 is increased oxygen delivery from increased hemoglobin concentration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available