4.6 Article

SUBARU AND GEMINI HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION INFRARED 18 μm IMAGING OBSERVATIONS OF NEARBY LUMINOUS INFRARED GALAXIES

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 141, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/141/5/156

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: nuclei; galaxies: Seyfert; galaxies: starburst; infrared: galaxies

Funding

  1. [19740109]
  2. [22012006]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23540273, 22012006] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of a ground-based, high spatial resolution infrared 18 mu m imaging study of nearby luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs), using the Subaru 8.2 m and Gemini-South 8.1 m telescopes. The diffraction-limited images routinely achieved with these telescopes in the Q band (17-23 mu m) allow us to investigate the detailed spatial distribution of infrared emission in these LIRGs. We then investigate whether the emission surface brightnesses are modest, as observed in starbursts, or are so high that luminous active galactic nuclei (AGNs; high emission surface brightness energy sources) are indicated. The sample consists of 18 luminous buried AGN candidates and starburst-classified LIRGs identified in earlier infrared spectroscopy. We find that the infrared 18 mu m emission from the buried AGN candidates is generally compact, and the estimated emission surface brightnesses are high, sometimes exceeding the maximum value observed in and theoretically predicted for a starburst phenomenon. The starburst-classified LIRGs usually display spatially extended 18 mu m emission and the estimated emission surface brightnesses are modest, within the range sustained by a starburst phenomenon. The general agreement between infrared spectroscopic and imaging energy diagnostic methods suggests that both are useful tools for understanding the hidden energy sources of the dusty LIRG population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available