4.6 Article

ASTROMETRY.NET: BLIND ASTROMETRIC CALIBRATION OF ARBITRARY ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages 1782-1800

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782

Keywords

astrometry; catalogs; instrumentation: miscellaneous; methods: data analysis; methods: statistical; techniques: image processing

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. CRC
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [NAG5-11669, NNX08AJ48G]
  4. National Science Foundation [AST-0428465, AST-0908357]
  5. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  6. NASA Spitzer Space Telescope [30842, 50568]
  7. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  8. Participating Institutions
  9. National Science Foundation
  10. U.S. Department of Energy
  11. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  12. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  13. Max Planck Society
  14. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  15. American Museum of Natural History
  16. Astrophysical Institute Potsdam
  17. University of Basel, University of Cambridge
  18. Case Western Reserve University
  19. University of Chicago
  20. Drexel University
  21. Fermilab
  22. Institute for Advanced Study
  23. Japan Participation Group
  24. Johns Hopkins University
  25. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  26. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  27. Korean Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST)
  28. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  29. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  30. Max-PlanckInstitute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  31. New Mexico State University
  32. Ohio State University
  33. University of Pittsburgh
  34. University of Portsmouth
  35. Princeton University
  36. United States Naval Observatory
  37. University of Washington
  38. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  39. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0908357] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have built a reliable and robust system that takes as input an astronomical image, and returns as output the pointing, scale, and orientation of that image (the astrometric calibration or World Coordinate System information). The system requires no first guess, and works with the information in the image pixels alone; that is, the problem is a generalization of the lost in space problem in which nothing-not even the image scale-is known. After robust source detection is performed in the input image, asterisms (sets of four or five stars) are geometrically hashed and compared to pre-indexed hashes to generate hypotheses about the astrometric calibration. A hypothesis is only accepted as true if it passes a Bayesian decision theory test against a null hypothesis. With indices built from the USNO-B catalog and designed for uniformity of coverage and redundancy, the success rate is >99.9% for contemporary near-ultraviolet and visual imaging survey data, with no false positives. The failure rate is consistent with the incompleteness of the USNO-B catalog; augmentation with indices built from the Two Micron All Sky Survey catalog brings the completeness to 100% with no false positives. We are using this system to generate consistent and standards-compliant meta-data for digital and digitized imaging from plate repositories, automated observatories, individual scientific investigators, and hobbyists. This is the first step in a program of making it possible to trust calibration meta-data for astronomical data of arbitrary provenance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available