4.7 Article

Seismic and laboratory constraints on crustal formation in a former continental arc (ACCRETE, southeastern Alaska and western British Columbia)

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 108, Issue B1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2001JB001740

Keywords

Continental crust; seismic velocity; crustal growth; batholith; accreted tarranes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[1] The ACCRETE project studies continent formation by assemblage of exotic terranes and arc magmatism. A marine-land seismic profile crosses the terranes with dense sampling and remarkably strong S waves as well as P waves. Unique, high-quality S-wave seismic data provide further constraints on interpretation and are used together with new laboratory P- and S-wave velocity measurements ( corrected for high temperatures within and at the base of the crust) to make a lithologic and petrologic interpretation. V-P/V-S ratios indicate three distinct terranes that were assembled to form continental crust. These terranes are the outboard, accreted Alexander-Wrangellia terrane, the Coast Mountains Batholith (CMB) magmatic arc, and the inboard Stikinia terrane. Below the CMB, V-P and V-P/V-S to a depth of 10-15 km are appropriate for tonalite and diorite. The V-P and V-P/V-S increase with depth indicating that the rocks become more mafic, but V-P/V-S is not high enough for gabbro. The V-P and V-P/V-S of the lower crust are consistent with a mixture of mafic garnet granulite and restite, whose quartz content lowers the V-P/V-S ratio below that of gabbro. When corrected for high temperature and uplift due to exhumation, the crust under the CMB exhibits seismic properties of an average continental crust. These results suggest that gabbro could have intruded a metasedimentary pile in the deep crust to cause melting of the metasediments to form intrusions of the CMB, leaving behind a mixture of mafic garnet granulite and sillmanite-garnet-quartz restite and generating the deeper part of what becomes an average continental crustal section.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available