4.7 Article

CD24 is an independent prognostic marker of survival in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 231-236

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600702

Keywords

nonsmall cell lung cancer; CD24; tissue microarray; immunohistochemistry

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Originally identified as a B-cell marker, expression of the cell surface molecule CD24 has meanwhile been observed in a variety of human malignancies. It appear's to function as a ligand of P-Selectin, an adhesion molecule that is present in activated platelets and endothelial cells. We aimed to determine the rate of CD24 expression in our nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collection and to clarify its correlation with clinicopathological parameters including patients' survival. A total of 89 NSCLC were analysed immunolhistochemically using a monoclonal CD24 antibody (clone 24C02) and a standard detection system (LSAB, DAKO) on NSCLC tissue microarrays (TMA). The staining was semiquantitatively scored (0, 1+, 2+, 3+) and grouped into. high (2+, 3+)- and low (0, 1+)-level expression for statistical analysis. A high level of CD24 expression was observed in 45% of the cases, preferentially adenocarcinomas. Patients whose tumours had a high CD24 expression showed a significantly shorter median survival time of 23 months vs 38 months (P = 0.033, log-rank test). Similarly tumour, grading, nodal status and clinical stage were significant prognostic markers in univariate survival analysis. Importantly, in the Cox regress ion-based multivariate analysis, CD24 expression (P=0.025) together with tumour stage (P = 0.006) and grade (P = 0.011) proved to be independent prognostic parameters. We hypothesise that the decreased survival of NSCLC patients with strongly CD24-positive tumours is related to an enhanced propensity of haematogenous metastasis formation, which might be P-Selectin mediated. C 2003 Cancer Research UK.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available