4.7 Article

Predictors and clinical impact of epilepsy after subarachnoid hemorrhage

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 208-214

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000038906.71394.DE

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the frequency, predictors, and impact on outcome of epilepsy developing during the first year after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Methods: The authors prospectively analyzed 247 of 431 patients with SAH treated over a period of 5 years who were alive with follow-up at 12 months. Epilepsy was defined as two or more unprovoked seizures after hospital discharge. Results: New-onset epilepsy occurred in 7% (n = 17) of patients; an additional 4% (n = 10) had only one seizure after discharge. Independent predictors of epilepsy included subdural hematoma (OR 9.9, 95% CI 1.9 to 52.8) and cerebral infarction (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4 to 11.3). Unlike those without seizures, patients who developed epilepsy failed to experience functional recovery on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) between 3 and 12 months after SAH. At 12 months epilepsy was independently associated with severe disability (score greater than or equal to 3) on the mRS (OR 10.3, 95% CI 2.5 to 42.0), increased, instrumental disability on the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale (OR 4.9; 95% CI 1.1 to 22.2), reduced quality of life on the Sickness Impact Profile (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.1 to 18.0), and increased state anxiety on the Spielberger Anxiety Inventory (OR 4.8; 95% CI 1.1 to 20.4). Epilepsy was not associated with cognitive impairment, depression, or subjective life satisfaction. Conclusion: Epilepsy occurred in 7% of patients with SAH, was predicted by subdural hematoma and cerebral infarction, and was associated with poor functional recovery and quality of life. Our findings indicate that focal pathology, rather than diffuse injury from hemorrhage, is the principal cause of epilepsy after SAH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available