4.6 Article

STAR FORMATION HISTORY IN THE SMALL MAGELLANIC CLOUD: THE CASE OF NGC 602

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages 3668-3684

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3668

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: star clusters; Magellanic Clouds; open clusters and associations: individual (NGC 602); stars: formation; stars: pre-main sequence

Funding

  1. PRIN-INAF-2005
  2. NASA [10248]
  3. Space Telescope Science Institute
  4. AURA, Inc., under NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  5. University of Wisconsin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep Hubble Space Telescope/Advanced Camera for Surveys photometry of the young cluster NGC 602, located in the remote low-density wing of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), reveals numerous pre-main-sequence (PMS) stars as well as young stars on the main sequence. The resolved stellar content thus provides a basis for studying the star formation history (SFH) into recent times and constraining several stellar population properties, such as the present-day mass function (PDMF), the initial mass function, and the binary fraction. To better characterize the PMS population, we present a new set of model stellar evolutionary tracks for this evolutionary phase with metallicity appropriate for the SMC (Z = 0.004). We use a stellar population synthesis code, which takes into account a full range of stellar evolution phases to derive our best estimate for the SFH in the region by comparing observed and synthetic color-magnitude diagrams. The derived PDMF for NGC 602 is consistent with that resulting from the synthetic diagrams. The star formation rate in the region has increased with time on a scale of tens of Myr, reaching (0.3-0.7) x 10(-3) M-circle dot yr(-1) in the last 2.5 Myr, comparable to what is found in Galactic OB associations. Star formation is most complete in the main cluster but continues at moderate levels in the gas-rich periphery of the nebula.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available