4.6 Article

MASS OUTFLOW FROM RED GIANT STARS IN M13, M15, AND M92

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages 615-624

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/2/615

Keywords

globular clusters: general; globular clusters: individual (M13, M15, M92); stars: AGB and post-AGB; stars: chromospheres; stars: mass loss

Funding

  1. SAO Predoctoral Fellowship
  2. NASA
  3. Hungarian OTKA [K76816]
  4. Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chromospheric model calculations of the H alpha line for selected red giant branch and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars in the globular clusters M13, M15, and M92 are constructed to derive mass loss rates (MLRs). The model spectra are compared to the observations obtained with the Hectochelle on the MMT telescope. These stars show strong H alpha emissions and blueshifted H alpha cores signaling that mass outflow is present in all stars. Outflow velocities of 3-19 km s(-1), larger than indicated by H alpha profiles, are needed in the upper chromosphere to achieve good agreement between the model spectra and the observations. The resulting MLRs range from 0.6 x 10(-9) to 5 x 10(-9) M-circle dot yr(-1), which are about an order of magnitude lower than predicted from Reimers' law or inferred from the infrared excess of similar stars. The MLR increases slightly with luminosity and with decreasing effective temperature. Stars in the more metal-rich M13 have higher MLRs by a factor of similar to 2 than in the metal-poor clusters M15 and M92. A fit to the MLRs is given by (M) over dot (M-circle dot yr(-1)) = 0.092 x L-0.16 x T-eff(-2.02) x A(0.37), where A = 10([Fe/H]). Multiple observations of stars revealed one object in M15, K757, in which the mass outflow increased by a factor of 6 between two observations separated by 18 months. Other stars showed changes in MLR by a factor of 1.5 or less.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available