4.6 Article

THE DISAPPEARANCE OF Lyα BLOBS: A GALEX SEARCH AT z=0.8

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages 986-990

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/3/986

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: individual (Cl 0023+0423, MS 1054-0321); galaxies: evolution; ultraviolet: galaxies

Funding

  1. NASA [NNG05GE51G]
  2. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales of France
  3. Korean Ministry of Science and Education
  4. Dean's Leadership Board Faculty Fellowship
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F001967/1, PP/E00105X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. STFC [ST/F001967/1, PP/E00105X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ly alpha blobs-luminous, spatially extended emission-line nebulae, often lacking bright continuum counterparts-are common in dense environments at high redshift. Until recently, atmospheric absorption and filter technology have limited our knowledge of any similar objects at z <= 2. We use Galaxy Evolution Explorer slitless spectroscopy to search for similar objects in the rich environments of two known cluster and supercluster fields at z = 0.8, where the instrumental sensitivity peaks. The regions around Cl 1054-0321 and Cl 0023+0423 were each observed in slitless-spectrum mode for 10-19 ks, with accompanying direct images of 3-6 ks to assist in recognizing continuum sources. Using several detection techniques, we find no resolved Ly alpha emitters to a flux limit of (1.5-9) x 10(-15) erg cm(-2) s(-1), on size scales of 5-30 arcsec. This corresponds to line luminosities of (0.5-3) x 10(43) erg s(-1) for linear scales 35-200 kpc. Comparison with both blind and targeted surveys at higher redshifts indicates that the population must have evolved in comoving density at least as strongly as (1 + z)(3). These results suggest that the population of Ly alpha blobs is specific to the high-redshift universe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available