4.7 Article

A self-administered questionnaire to measure dependence on cigarettes: The Cigarette Dependence Scale

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 359-370

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300030

Keywords

tobacco use disorder; nicotine dependence; smoking; validation studies; epidemiologic measurements; internet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A valid measure of dependence on cigarettes is a useful tool for clinicians and researchers. The aim of this study was to develop a new, self-administered measure of cigarette dependence, and to assess its validity. The content of the instrument was generated in qualitative surveys. A long version (114 items) was tested on the internet in 3009 smokers. Subsamples provided retest data after 18 days (n = 578), follow-up data after 45 days (n=990) and saliva cotinine (n= 105). The study resulted in a 12-item scale labelled the Cigarette Dependence Scale (CDS-12), and in a 5-item version of this scale (CDS-5). Except for tolerance, CDS-12 covers the main components of DSM-IV and ICD-10 definitions of dependence: compulsion, withdrawal symptoms, loss of control, time allocation, neglect of other activities, and persistence despite harm. CDS-5 has similar measurement properties but less comprehensive content. Both scales had a high test-retest reliability (rgreater than or equal to0.83), and a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alphagreater than or equal to0.84). CDS-12 scores were higher in daily smokers than in occasional smokers (+1.3SD units), and were associated with the strength of the urge to smoke during the last quit attempt (R(2)greater than or equal to0.25), and with saliva cotinine (R(2)greater than or equal to0.17). CDS-12 and CDS-5 scores decreased in daily smokers who switched to occasional smoking at 18-day retest. Dependence scores did not predict smoking abstinence at follow-up. In conclusion, CDS-12 and CDS-5 are reliable measures of cigarette dependence which fulfill several criteria of content validity and construct validity and are sensitive to change over time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available