4.4 Article

A Simple Template-Dependent Ligase Ribozyme as the RNA Replicase Emerging First in the RNA World

Journal

ASTROBIOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 437-447

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/ast.2009.0385

Keywords

RNA world; Ribozymes; Prebiotic evolution; Modeling studies

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30870660]
  2. National 973 Fundamental Research Program [2010CB530500, 2010CB530503]
  3. Hubei Natural Science Foundation of China [2003S2113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The RNA world'' hypothesis has offered a framework for both experimental and theoretical work in the field of the origin of life. An important concern about the hypothesis is how the RNA world could originate. It has long been speculated that a template-dependent RNA synthetase ribozyme, which catalyzed its own replication (thus, an RNA replicase''), should have emerged first. However, experimental searches for such a replicase have so far been unsuccessful. This is primarily because of the large sequence length of candidate ribozymes, which mainly work in a polymerase-like way. Here, we propose that the replicase that emerged first would be a simple template-dependent ligase ribozyme, which loosely binds to template RNA and has a relatively low efficiency of catalyzing the formation of phosphodiester bonds between adjacently aligned nucleotides or oligonucleotides. We conducted a computer simulation to support this proposal and considered the factors that might affect the emergence of the ribozyme based on the parameter analysis in the simulation. We conclude that (1) a template-dependent ligase may be more likely than a template-dependent polymerase as an early replicase in the emergence of RNA-based replication; (2) such a ligase ribozyme could emerge and be stable against parasites under a broad range of parameters in our model; (3) the conditions shown to favor the initial appearance of a template-dependent ligase ribozyme do not favor its spread.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available