4.7 Article

Isoform-dependent cholesterol efflux from macrophages by apolipoprotein E is modulated by cell surface proteoglycans

Journal

ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 269-274

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000054199.78458.4B

Keywords

apolipoprotein E; isoforms; cholesterol efflux; RAW264.7 cells; heparan-sulfate proteoglycans

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-Apolipoprotein E (apoE) mediates cellular cholesterol efflux and plays a crucial role in the inhibition of atherogenesis. We investigated whether there is an isoform-specific difference in its function for cholesterol efflux from cholesterol-loaded RAW264.7 cells, a murine macrophage cell line that lacks endogenous apoE expression. Methods and Results-When human apoE was expressed in RAW264.7 cells, apoE2 reduced cellular total cholesterol (TC) and esterified cholesterol (EC) levels significantly, whereas apoE3 and apoE4 had no effect. However, treatment of cells with 4-methylumbelliferyl-7-beta-D-xyloside (beta-DX) resulted in all 3 isoforms' reducing cellular TC and EC contents significantly. We also investigated the effect of exogenously derived apoE on cholesterol efflux by utilizing the medium harvested from HeLa cells expressing apoE. ApoE2 and E3 reduced both cellular TC and EC contents significantly, whereas apoE4 did not. However, treatment of the cells with beta-DX resulted in all 3 exogenously derived apoE isoforms' reducing TC and EC contents significantly. The binding ability of apoE to heparan sulfate proteoglycans examined by heparinase I treatment revealed less binding ability of apoE2 compared with that of apoE3 or apoE4. Conclusions-The present study clarified the differential cellular cholesterol-modulating effect of apoE isoforms in macrophages, which would be due to the difference in their binding to proteoglycans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available