4.4 Article

SOLID2: An Antibody Array-Based Life-Detector Instrument in a Mars Drilling Simulation Experiment (MARTE)

Journal

ASTROBIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 987-999

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ast.2007.0126

Keywords

SOLID instrument; MARTE project; Antibody microarray; Rio Tinto subsurface as Mars analogue

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [ESP2004-05008]
  2. Centro de Astrobiologia (CAB)
  3. Instituto Nacional de Tecnica Aeroespacial (INTA)
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  5. Astrobiology Science and Technology for Exploring Planets (ASTEP) [NRA 02-OSS-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A field prototype of an antibody array-based life-detector instrument, Signs of Life Detector (SOLID2), has been tested in a Mars drilling mission simulation called MARTE (Mars Astrobiology Research and Technology Experiment). As one of the analytical instruments on the MARTE robotic drilling rig, SOLID2 performed automatic sample processing and analysis of ground core samples (0.5 g) with protein microarrays that contained 157 different antibodies. Core samples from different depths (down to 5.5 m) were analyzed, and positive reactions were obtained in antibodies raised against the Gram-negative bacterium Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, a species of the genus Acidithiobacillus (both common microorganisms in the Rio Tinto area), and extracts from biofilms and other natural samples from the Rio Tinto area. These positive reactions were absent when the samples were previously subjected to a high-temperature treatment, which indicates the biological origin and structural dependency of the antibody-antigen reactions. We conclude that an antibody array-based life-detector instrument like SOLID2 can detect complex biological material, and it should be considered as a potential analytical instrument for future planetary missions that search for life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available