4.8 Article

Risk factors contributing to early and date phase intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 200-207

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00360-4

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma; intrahepatic recurrence; hepatectomy; metastasis; multicentric occurrence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundlAims: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate factors to early and late phase recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: The study population consisted of 249 patients including 157 with cirrhosis who underwent hepatectomy for HCC. The endpoint was time-to-recurrence. Using a Cox regression model, factors to early and late phase recurrences were investigated censoring recurrence-free patients at the 2-year time point and in patients without recurrence at 2 years. Results: Actuarial probability of overall recurrence at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.301, 0.623, and 0.790, respectively, with a median follow-up of 624 days. Early recurrence was observed in 123 out of 249 patients; while late recurrence was found in 61 out of 113 patients. Factors to early recurrence were as follows: non-anatomical resection, presence of microscopic vascular invasion, and serum alpha-fetoprotein level greater than or equal to32 ng/ml. Those contributing to late phase recurrence were higher grade of hepatitis activity, multiple tumors, and gross tumor classification. Conclusions: Variables associated with metastatic recurrence were factors to early phase recurrence; whereas those related with elevated carcinogenesis contributed to late phase recurrence, thus providing an epidemiological evidence that different mechanisms, i.e. metastasis and de novo, are involved in intrahepatic recurrence after hepatectomy for HCC. (C) 2002 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available