4.4 Article

Microbial rock inhabitants survive hypervelocity impacts on Mars-like host planets:: First phase of lithopanspermia experimentally tested

Journal

ASTROBIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 17-44

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ast.2007.0134

Keywords

lithopanspermia; impact; shock pressure; ejecta; microbial survival; interplanetary transfer of life

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/F003102/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F003102/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scenario of lithopanspermia describes the viable transport of microorganisms via meteorites. To test the first step of lithopanspermia, i. e., the impact ejection from a planet, systematic shock recovery experiments within a pressure range observed in martian meteorites (5-50 GPa) were performed with dry layers of microorganisms ( spores of Bacillus subtilis, cells of the endolithic cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis, and thalli and ascocarps of the lichen Xanthoria elegans) sandwiched between gabbro discs ( martian analogue rock). Actual shock pressures were determined by refractive index measurements and Raman spectroscopy, and shock temperature profiles were calculated. Pressure- effect curves were constructed for survival of B. subtilis spores and Chroococcidiopsis cells from the number of colony-forming units, and for vitality of the photobiont and mycobiont of Xanthoria elegans from confocal laser scanning microscopy after live/dead staining (FUN-I). A vital launch window for the transport of rock-colonizing microorganisms from a Mars-like planet was inferred, which encompasses shock pressures in the range of 5 to about 40 GPa for the bacterial endospores and the lichens, and a more limited shock pressure range for the cyanobacterium ( from 5-10 GPa). The results support concepts of viable impact ejections from Mars-like planets and the possibility of reseeding early Earth after asteroid cataclysms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available